Thursday, June 16, 2011

gop debate video

images 2012 GOP Debate - Video gop debate video. 2008 Republican Debate Civil
  • 2008 Republican Debate Civil



  • pkak
    07-09 10:50 PM
    That really makes Sense, I believe USCIS/DOS are smart agencies, and wont do those kind of silly mistakes..

    Whether they are smart people or not, a future department of justice investigation will find out.


    http://s202395528.onlinehome.us/category/general/

    However I see a way out for DOS/USCIS. They can avoid class action by claiming that they had warned the public in advance via the July 2 update to the July visa bulletin, and had modified the July visa bulletin only on July 6, after warning the public in advance. This way they can accept all applications received till July 5, and will be covered against any class action law suits.





    wallpaper 2008 Republican Debate Civil gop debate video. GOP Hopefuls Debate Again
  • GOP Hopefuls Debate Again



  • sledge_hammer
    07-24 10:11 AM
    To file for EAD/AP you need to wait until you get your I-485 receipt. PD is irrelevant after your I-485 applications has been receipted.

    Few employers and few lawyers didn't apply for EAD/AP on July 2nd. My employer said they applied for 485 but not EAD/AP. They will wait for receipt notice and then apply for EAD/AP.
    After Aug 17th, can we still apply for EAD/AP knowing dates won't be current.

    Thanks.





    gop debate video. 2012 republican debate video
  • 2012 republican debate video



  • ItIsNotFunny
    02-13 01:43 PM
    Ash,

    I can understand your concerns and frustration. You have taken good amount of time and efforts to draft this.

    We all are going through the same pain but need to be carefully for our choice of words. You don't want listeners to be on opposite side of what you are saying just because of bad choice of words and language. What you are mentioning can be drafted in good words (In India we used to call as Sugar Coated).

    There are parts of world never give citizenship or too difficult to get perm residency also like Switzerland, Germany to name couple of them. Lets be more objective and decide how we encounter the situation we are in.

    I am always promoter of Gandhigiri and second flower campaign. AlbertPinto has started a thread for this. Lets just work on this.

    I would like to bring to the notice of your readers, editorial committee and leaders of
    the Indian community of a systematic way that (legally) the US Government is practicing

    ....

    driven out of the country which they have loyally served for varying periods of time.....

    God Bless America....God Save America from 'some' of its own people.

    Thanks.





    2011 GOP Hopefuls Debate Again gop debate video. Fox Republican debate in
  • Fox Republican debate in



  • mheggade
    07-18 04:17 PM
    I could seee all the EB3 folks with PD older than 2006 and EB2 folks with PD older than 2008 will be cleared off in the next two years. I am sure there wont be not more than 1 or 2 years delay between EB2 and EB3 categories in near future.And there are lot of things going to happen for employment based immigratin in the next two years.


    vdlrao,

    I disagree with you. Per my calculation USCIS should have at-least 158k application with PD 2002 and 2003 (all chargeability, all cat). And yes I have arrived at this number after deducting already approved EB2 and EB3 numbers.
    If you do INDIA:CHINA:MEXICO :: 40:30:30 ratio.

    The break up of outstanding I485 looks like this

    India :- 64k
    China :- 47K
    Mexico:- 47K

    As per my calculation Eb3 India do not have good outlook.



    more...


    gop debate video. GOP candidates to debate in NH
  • GOP candidates to debate in NH



  • chanduv23
    11-22 10:47 PM
    [QUOTE=ImmiLosers]Document URL
    http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/afm_ch22_091206R.pdf

    PAGE 27
    (1) Determining the Priority Date.
    unless the previously approved Form I-140 petition has been revoked because of fraud or willful misrepresentation.

    This is clear. Unless the 140 was found to be fradulant or misrtepresentation, the PD is transferable. Am I not right ????





    gop debate video. Republican Debate June 13
  • Republican Debate June 13



  • ivdude
    01-16 05:04 PM
    I faced this pain before christmas



    more...


    gop debate video. Hampshire GOP debate wаѕ a
  • Hampshire GOP debate wаѕ a



  • makemygc
    07-05 12:54 PM
    Spciy thread?? This is not spicy. This is serious stuff. I am not the OP, but the subject of the thread might be spicy to some folks. This discussion has come so many times. Atleast now we see that we have equal number of people split on both sides.

    Assume you make it paid. Then what. We will have maximum 400-500 users and you want to go and lobby or fight with congress with that much number of users. I still do not understand why this thread is still active. Well my post is going to bump it up so I'll not respond to this post any more. Lets focus on other drives as suggested by pappu. We are just waiting too much time discussing fruitile things.





    2010 2012 republican debate video gop debate video. 2012 GOP Debate - Video
  • 2012 GOP Debate - Video



  • illinois_alum
    07-16 08:15 AM
    Your company should be quite rich to keep paying for EAD's and AP's you don't need, with their periodical extensions, and also for your H1 renewals....

    Don't know about his company...but the attorney definitely must be quite rich with all the legal charges :D



    more...


    gop debate video. GOP debate: Republican
  • GOP debate: Republican



  • kshitijnt
    07-13 07:53 PM
    Guys:

    Atleast appreciate the letter she has written. Maybe you are not satisfied by attorney Murthy and she has not done enough for you. But here she is adding to the voice for immigrants. Something is better than nothing!!!





    hair Fox Republican debate in gop debate video. from Republican Debate
  • from Republican Debate



  • seeker999
    08-11 03:23 PM
    August 15th being Independence day.

    In lot of cities we are having India day celebrations. Especially in Major cities. Senators are being invited. We should take this opportunity to explain and leave a flyer or something. One such example is

    Welcome to India League of America - Michigan... (http://www.ilamichigan.org/events/index.html)

    I will be there and make sure the voice is heard. Do we have any standard document or something.

    I personally know that almost all congress men call and ask the presidents of these organizations what is it that your community needs...so this will be right opportunity to push the presidents and the politicians of these organizations...

    Just my thoughts...



    more...


    gop debate video. GOP candidates to debate in NH
  • GOP candidates to debate in NH



  • WillIBLucky
    11-22 01:23 PM
    I dont think that is correct - as per my lawyer this is what she says -

    In order to move to a new employer and still continue with the same gc applications, you must meet all of the following conditions under AC21:

    1. Your I-140 must be approved
    2. Your I-485 must be filed and pending for at least 180 days
    3. Your new job classification must be the same as in the old job

    If you are missing any of the 3 conditions at the time you move to an employer, you will lose your gc application and you will need to start a new one.

    So guys please make sure you give correct information. Also, I would suggest people who are asking various questions over here in IV should also talk to their own lawyers and take a decision. Please do not take decision based on comments given over here. So "LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP".





    hot GOP candidates to debate in NH gop debate video. CNN Republican Debate
  • CNN Republican Debate



  • svr_76
    06-10 01:24 PM
    xactly. so the immi grps impacted are H1 and recent/new I-140 filers.

    In the past pure H1B holder (no intension to adjust or working for firms that dont sponser GC) were not actively participating in IV's activities as they were never impacted and had the option to stay away.

    This new rule-making definitely impact them..and should be an opportunity to join IV in more active way.



    more...


    house John McCain and Mitt Romney, Republican Presidential Debate, January 30, gop debate video. Re: CNN REPUBLICAN DEBATE:WAR
  • Re: CNN REPUBLICAN DEBATE:WAR



  • gc_on_demand
    11-11 01:36 PM
    IV needs funds for lobbying. So rajuram - please start a campaign to collect funds for lobbying. You can be the first contributor. You can help in all ways, by lobbying, media, funding and driving threads to collect funds.

    Shall we start a funding drive? rajuram - can you lead it?

    We can do something to start with call. later admin adds funding drive or some senior member will add funding drive. Why people asking for IV core is If I or other member will start some thread/campaign it will divert to other discussion or no more support. But I have notice that if IV core starts it people become active and call or write email.

    Even being a organization some one may be prez of IV org can call Zoe and find out what will be deal with HR 5882 in lame duck session. They will not reply to me or other members but atleast can reply to some IV rep.

    hows that ? I am not favoring rajuram or not against chandu.. just expressing what I am thinking and what others may do..





    tattoo Republican Debate June 13 gop debate video. Republican debate
  • Republican debate



  • geesee
    01-16 05:18 PM
    ...
    For GC holders I don�t know how you guys felt when you received your GC, I felt at that moment I got my citizenship.
    ...


    Good one :)

    I can certainly feel the tension that you shared in your story... recently we had few layoffs in our group...and i had to go thro the same.. more than GC, these days i am really waiting for some improvement in overall market...



    more...


    pictures Hampshire GOP debate wаѕ a gop debate video. For the Republican Debate-
  • For the Republican Debate-



  • franklin
    07-03 06:34 PM
    with out a reliable website, we can't communicate and do all the important things(productive) you are talking. maintaining a reliable website doesn't need much funds.

    Anti immigrants will not know our plans if we may this a paid website.
    Yes, there are other ways that in an emergency you can keep in touch with IV. Total waste of valuable money, for the couple of occasions it has happened





    dresses CNN Republican Debate gop debate video. Ovide at the Nashua City Debate Q4-Romney/Palin
  • Ovide at the Nashua City Debate Q4-Romney/Palin



  • indyanguy
    07-28 12:26 PM
    Now a days this has become a fashion to bash Hinduism and people take pride in doing so just to make a point to prove that they are very secular and far sighted and very broad minded but infact these are the people who are pseudo-secular and the reason for majority Hindus in our own country being held hostage by the policticians and the largest minority community in india.....
    I've seen this many times that any hindu who speaks their mind and strong believers in their religion will be tagged as fundamentalists and rss supporters where as I have nothing to do with any religious groups but I am proud of my RELIGION and it does hurt me when I see my religion/gods depicted in a bad way. If you are a aethist then just shutup but don't bash Hindu religion and I am sure that all the guys who tried to do so dont have balls to bash other religions coz they know the conseqences of it and I am sure these religious bashing people are the one who'd visit temple to get their greencards but don't accept it either becoz they are hypocrates or ashamed of their own religion......

    You hit the nail on the head. I definitely agree that opposing the hindu religion has become a fashion statement especially in the so called highly educated highly skilled community. If you don't like hinduism, keep your mouth shut and convert yourself to the other liberal religions out there.



    more...


    makeup GOP debate: Republican gop debate video. John McCain and Mitt Romney, Republican Presidential Debate, January 30,
  • John McCain and Mitt Romney, Republican Presidential Debate, January 30,



  • jsb
    01-22 10:10 AM
    I felt sympathy for the OP. That was well written. I agree that xyzgc missed the point on what the OP was trying to say.
    You on the other hand are arrogant. Are you saying that it is your right to buy a house? And we all should sympathize with you when you lose your house? And we need to fund your extravagant spending with our tax dollars, while some of us weigh in the risks and decide to live in rented house.
    I wish I get my share of the bail out money. I wanted that Ferrari. Damn, I need to 'enjoy my life and my desire to lead quality of life'.

    Nothing is right or wrong, as meaning of quality of life is a very subjective thing.

    In Japan, people work hard, send money/products to the US, and be happy for better quality of life by looking at increasing balances in their bank books each morning, and don't care what homes/cars they have.

    In the US, people get happy for better quality of life by looking at their new BMW's, and nicely furnished homes (bought by money borrowed from Japanese investors), and don't care what they owe.

    Both are unhappy too, for not having enough what they want more, Japanese want to have bigger balances in their bank books, and American want bigger BMW's and homes.

    "Peace of Mind - Do you have" referenced in posts above is just a price for the quaility of life they "enjoy". No enjoyment comes without a price.





    girlfriend Republican debate gop debate video. GOP Debate: Newt Gingrich#39;s
  • GOP Debate: Newt Gingrich#39;s



  • TeddyKoochu
    09-10 01:17 PM
    where is this 120k EB2I and C coming up from, those who haven't filed 485 yet? So you are expecting another july 2007 making all EB2 Current.

    Here is a brief calculation of EB2 Demand till date (Today's Date)
    The total demand till date is ~ 120K which is
    Demand up to Aug 2007 = 45K
    Sep 2007 to Dec 2008 = 16 * 2.5K Perm Month = 40K
    Jan 2009 to Oct 2010 = 22 * 1.5K per month = 33K
    New PD porting after Aug 2007 (Current Eb3 Inventory is 60K till Aug 2007) = 10K
    Total 45 + 40 + 33 + 10 = 128K. This may be inflated but it is atleast 120K.

    By giving these numbers I don’t mean to scare anybody but it’s better to have a tryst with true reality rather than be ignorant. It is better to have an understanding of the backlog rather than feeling bad VB after VB, nothing will change soon because the backlog is so huge.

    If you look at the numbers it is very unlikely that EB2 will literally become current any time soon, the end of the pre-adjudicated numbers is just a tipping point and when this happens anything could happen 1) Make dates current (I personally welcome that atleast everybody gets a chance to file for I485) 2) Keep accepting applications in a controlled manner so as to approve in quarter or year. 3) Grant spillover to EB3 ROW (EB3 ROW backlog is so huge like EB2 - I in the same range 100-120K that the spillover will disappear in no time, also note that EB3 ROW incremental demand is much higher than EB2 ROW). If you look at EB2 ROW for last year they were current for the whole year but approvals came from 2007. Its the agencies discretion really how they want to control and regulate the demand and honor the INA and the distribution rules. I believe that what may happen when EB2-I/C preadjudicated numbers get exhausted is Option # 2) Keep accepting applications in a controlled manner so as to approve in quarter or year because this is what happened for EB2 ROW; again this is my personal guess / assumption. Also those who have not been able to file for I485 cannot be kept in a endless denial with the preadjudicated numbers exhausted I think the chance will come for EB2 friends.

    The spillover is a happening of the present time when the economy is bad, the moment this changes everything will disappear and there will be no difference between EB2 and EB3 if you belong to a retrogressed country we will all be at 3K Per annum and EB5 contribution if any will be consumed by PD porting which will increase manifold as EB3-I folks waiting for 10 years is simply unacceptable, currently there a 60K folks here just till 2007. I strongly favor porting waiting for 10 years is unacceptable. Also being without EAD / AP is very hard, great that we have a IV campaign initiated for this the efforts in this direction are laudable. Actually as Pappu, Admin2 and others have been saying EB3-EB2 even though may be relevant now is actually meaningless this is relevant only in this temporary phase of time fighting on these lines will not help to attain any objective rather it will kill chances of EB3 friends with later PD to port. The biggest issue is the per country limits which equate talent pools like India and China and give them the same cap as countries which have 1/1000th population, if they cannot be eliminated atleast should be proportionate to population for larger countries and be at 7% for the smaller ones. PS - I have nothing personal against ROW friends.





    hairstyles GOP candidates to debate in NH gop debate video. Romney #39;against auto bailout#39;
  • Romney #39;against auto bailout#39;



  • bkarnik
    07-25 06:46 PM
    Thanks a lot, please keep us posted about the outcome, even if we have one percent of hope, there is no harm trying that.

    Guys,

    This argument is not new. I had started a thread a while back http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=556&highlight=bkarnik
    which met with essentially the same reply from the IV moderators. My underlying issue is that the term "EAD" or anything remotely similar does not even appear in the INA unless I missed it and if so, I would really appreciate it if someone show me where it is.

    Anyways, I sent the following email to my lawyer, the entire chain with names deleted is reproduced here for your reading pleasure. This exchange highlights the apathy with which the legal community (at least my lawyer) view the issue and their knowledge of the law.... enjoy.. :(

    From: Attorney
    Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:57 PM
    To: Bkarnik
    Subject: RE: Question..

    I see your point. You should contact the American Immigration Lawyers Association with your question. If the issue has not already been addressed by this organization, I'm sure they will readily champion your cause.


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Bkarnik
    Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:49 AM
    To: attorney
    Subject: Question..

    Dear Attorney:

    Thank you for your time and the quick turnaround. However, the question still remains. If you notice in the link sent by you below, the USCIS refers to the US 8 CFR 274a.12(a) and (c) According to the USCIS, the CFR is the interpretation made by the agencies of the INA as passed and amended by Congress. The INA itself does not seem to have any clause relating to EAD for employment based categories because I believe the Congress never foresaw a situation where it will take up to 5-6 years for the process to complete.
    I know that the USCIS has on many occasions by using the Federal Register or by Memorandums modified the CFR or changed the regulations governing the validity of the EAD, and I am wondering if something similar can be achieved in this case, wherein an appeal is made to the USCIS to change the rules governing eligibility for issuing an EAD.

    Thanks once again.
    Bkarnik.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: AttorneySent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:57 PM
    To: Bkarnik
    Subject: RE: Question..

    Hello BKarnik,

    Your argument is sound, however, U.S. Immigration does indeed adjudicate
    I-765 EAD applications based upon eligibility for filing. Please click this
    link: http://uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/i-765.htm. It will take you to the USCIS web site where you can download form I-765. Included with the form is an instruction sheet. In the section entitled "Eligibility Categories", U.S. Immigration spells out the categories for which form I-765 may be filed. For example, under the "Foreign Students" title, you can see that an F-1 OPT student is eligible to obtain EAD work authorization pursuant to subsection (c)(3)(i). Your eligibility for EAD work authorization will fall under the "EAD Applicants Who Have Filed for Adjustment of Status" title under subsection (c)(9). Unfortunately, there is no eligibility category for I-140 IVP applicants or for IVP approval notice holders.

    I hope this answers your questions.

    Attorney

    ________________________________

    From: Bkarnik
    Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:16 PM
    To: Attorney
    Subject: Question..


    Dear Attorney:

    I had a question for you (actually, it is a series of sub questions).
    However, this has nothing to with my employer or my GC, so if you feel that replying to this question will take up an inordinate amount of time or of you think that this is something that is worthwhile in pursuing, please let me know what your charges will be and I will let you know if I can afford them :)) With that out of the way, here goes:

    The question is about getting an EAD before filing the I-485. I was perusing the INA as posted on the USCIS website. I did not find any applicable law that directs the USCIS when it can issue EADs. It is quite likely that I missed the section as I am not a student of laws as you are.
    If so, can you let me know where to find it? As you know, the EAD issue is mentioned in the US 8 CFR sec. 274a. Now, the USCIS website explains that the CFR thus: The general provisions of laws enacted by Congress are interpreted and implemented by regulations issued by various agencies.
    These
    regulations apply the law to daily situations. Thus, the CFR is the interpretation of the law by the USCIS for application in daily life.
    If
    that is the case, what prevents the USCIS from issuing EADs upon the approval of Form I-140? Especially, since as you very well know, the Form I-140 is an application made by the employer to the USCIS to petition for an alien worker to become a permanent resident in the United States.
    Therefore,
    the form requires the employer to fill in all the pertinent information about the alien and his dependents. An approval of the Form I-140 indicates (at least to me) that the USCIS has agreed with the employee that the labor certification is good and the alien is approvable as a permanent employee.
    I guess that is one of the reasons, the USCIS allows concurrent filing of the I-140/I-485.

    With the current retrogression concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 is not possible, if the USCIS were to be agreeable to issue EADs to persons with approved I-140 it would make life a lot easier for all while at the same time not impacting the green card process itself. All we are asking is that the EAD be issued after I-140 approval, because it does not make sense to tell an employer that the alien is approved for permanent employment, but at the same time asking the employer to keep the employee in a H1B (i.e.
    temporary status) at no fault of the employer/employee. Can you let me know if my argument is flawed? If not, do you think we have a way by which we can ask the USCIS for its interpretation or opinion on the issue? If we can, and you are willing to take the matter, can you let me know your fees?
    I know that you are very busy, and may not be able to take on the matter even if you find merit in it. In that case, would know of a competent person willing to take it up?

    Thank you for your time and patience,

    Sincerely,
    Bkarnik





    ramus
    07-03 05:10 PM
    Thank you.. Also please take part in media coverage thread...and also ask other members to contribute.



    Contributed $100 for the lawsuit.
    Confirmation Number: 40W931175C853351T.





    nomi
    12-12 04:15 PM
    USCIS is not a legislative body, they cannot pass a law. The Congress does. In order to change any existing laws Congress has to pass it and USCIS just implements it. So I do not think meeting USCIS will help. BTW what is DOS ?

    DOS is Department of State who controls all visa numbers.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Blog Archive