Thursday, June 16, 2011

dallas mavericks vs thunder

images Oklahoma City Thunder Vs. dallas mavericks vs thunder. Watch Dallas Mavericks vs
  • Watch Dallas Mavericks vs



  • gcformeornot
    02-03 09:02 PM
    Guru's please check if this employment letter is enough for the above mentioned RFE....


    Dear Sir/Madam

    Re: Employment of Mr. John Doe


    This is to confirm that Mr. John Doe is currently employed in our organization as a Senior Software Engineer at the annual salary of $ x per year.

    Mr. Doe�s compensation package includes medical, dental benefits, sick leave and paid holidays.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

    Sincerely yours,
    adding these additional things salary offered in LC is met....... this will not work. Per my attorney salary offered in LC needs to be without any such things.......





    wallpaper Watch Dallas Mavericks vs dallas mavericks vs thunder. Dallas took advantage to
  • Dallas took advantage to



  • paskal
    01-18 09:20 PM
    alisa,

    i'm only one step better- for now
    eb2- pd expected 1q 2007- but india

    btw, a fellow member from GA has made a power point slide with the condensed facts and statistics, it's posted on the iv-mn-mw web site
    we discussed this on the teleconference and the idea came up that we needed something like this for people without perspective
    we are hoping to refine this already excellent ppt into a valuable tool for everyone's use

    please do take a look...





    dallas mavericks vs thunder. of the Dallas Mavericks
  • of the Dallas Mavericks



  • StarSun
    03-18 10:25 AM
    VA/MD/DC members, please step up and contact sukhwinderd for hosting members. He is keeping track of people wanting to host and people requiring hosts...........

    There are a lot of people from far of states asking for hosts. These guys will only need a place to spend the night and a shower in the morning....Many of the VA/MD/DC members who have registered can just take one or two of the members home....





    2011 Dallas took advantage to dallas mavericks vs thunder. the Dallas Mavericks talks
  • the Dallas Mavericks talks



  • logiclife
    12-12 10:26 AM
    We have asked an immigration lawyer this question. Someone even quoted all the sections of INA and CFR(code of federal regulations) to make the point -- that you can have regulation changed to file 485.

    The lawyer was of the opinion that you need change in INA to be able to file 485 when dates are not current. It cannot be done with administrative changes.



    more...


    dallas mavericks vs thunder. Dallas Mavericks vs
  • Dallas Mavericks vs



  • coolmanasip
    06-19 03:09 PM
    My lawyer is asking for the tax returns for last three years for 485 filing??? I read W2s in the USCIS list but I do not know why he is asking for tax returns?? Any clue.....





    dallas mavericks vs thunder. Oklahoma City vs Dallas NBA
  • Oklahoma City vs Dallas NBA



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue



    more...


    dallas mavericks vs thunder. vs Dallas Mavericks
  • vs Dallas Mavericks



  • neoneo
    09-26 08:40 PM
    Here's a classic example ..

    If you look at the other threads on this forum you have people against the Durban bill coz it affects F-1 students . There is another section which is against Grassley coz it'll affect Consultants trying to get H1-B. I do understand Grassley's bill can have many implications and need to be opposed, but the focus still has to be towards alleviating the Employment based GC issues.

    I don't think CNN is to be faulted that much coz IV itself has lost its focus towards Employment Based Green Cards. period. thats what is started out to be and needs to come back on that track instead of trying to act as a platform for all Legal Immigration issues.

    Simply put IV is " EB-1/2/3- related org" ok..ok.. add in those millionaires who put in a million dollars for GC too.





    2010 of the Dallas Mavericks dallas mavericks vs thunder. Oklahoma City Thunder Vs.
  • Oklahoma City Thunder Vs.



  • immi_enthu
    08-15 04:35 PM
    yes but they will start processing the applications based on the receipt dates. so if a guy applied last year, he gets priority over last month's people. (that is assuming that his priority dates were current last year from him to apply!)

    also they will need to do fingerprinting etc. and shall pass the FBI check before they get to final stage of adjudication. that would take 6 more months. so they should look at the bulletin at that time to see if they are eligible. dont get excited about these dates - they are not that helpful for the last month filers.

    some people who applied in June may get approved if their PDs are current. July/ Aug filers unlikely



    more...


    dallas mavericks vs thunder. Mavericks.vs.Thunder.WCF.
  • Mavericks.vs.Thunder.WCF.



  • vijayassr
    02-23 02:24 AM
    Hi,
    Have a question on my visa.

    I applied for H1 visa with company A, when I am in US in Apr'08 with
    L1 thats getting expired, due to emergency I went to India.

    I got h1 approval notice with COS on July'23 2008.

    My Indian company B asked to get fresh L1 , so I took a stamping on
    Aug'20 2008 and came to US on L1

    changed company A with H1 visa . (company A did not do any COS again, since they say H1 is already with COS).

    Want to know if my H1 is valid do I need to do any other things to
    tell USCIS that I am on H1 NOW. Can I do stamping at Mexico/Cuba.

    If there is any problem above how to come out of it.





    hair the Dallas Mavericks talks dallas mavericks vs thunder. 2011: Dallas Mavericks vs.
  • 2011: Dallas Mavericks vs.



  • anshuman
    01-09 10:15 AM
    most of the desi consultants seem to be concentrated in NJ or Chicago. Are there any reliable desi consultants for H-1 in CA? What are the websites which give info in this direction?

    What are the steps to be followed and things to watch out for in selecting a desi consultant?

    Join Satyam computers, the one stop shop for all your body shopping needs. :D: They will do whatever it takes to get you a green card, by hook or crook.



    more...


    dallas mavericks vs thunder. Game 1 Dallas Mavericks vs
  • Game 1 Dallas Mavericks vs



  • engineer
    06-12 11:51 AM
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/





    hot Dallas Mavericks vs dallas mavericks vs thunder. Dallas Mavericks v Oklahoma
  • Dallas Mavericks v Oklahoma



  • aadimanav
    09-10 10:17 PM
    Updates from Greg Siskind's

    [Update] My report below is not correct. The initial report I received on the markup was not correct and the markup process was not competed today. I believe work is going to continue tomorrow or Friday and hopefully this will be done by the weekend. Apologies.]



    more...


    house Oklahoma City Thunder vs dallas mavericks vs thunder. Dallas Mavericks versus the
  • Dallas Mavericks versus the



  • brick2006
    11-11 03:06 AM
    he cant act on immigration when the economy is down and ppl are losing their jobs..so we are in a sinking boat...
    better to wait and watch!!!





    tattoo Oklahoma City vs Dallas NBA dallas mavericks vs thunder. Dallas Mavericks drives on
  • Dallas Mavericks drives on



  • bondgoli007
    02-15 07:55 PM
    wow!!! Among the most divisive debate if ever I have seen one on IV.

    Without offering my opinion on the topic at hand (divide and rule), I think "some" (not all or even most) of the members posting need to take a step back and see how hurtful their posts on this topic are getting to be. Some posts seem to have subtle racial bias and the ones in response seem to read too much into them too.

    Guys, try not to post reactive or even respond to posts that are purely personal. I for one feel that this thread really doesn't do anyone any good and though Canuck's reason might have been more noble, it clearly is inducing normally clear headed individuals to get angry :-)


    We all agree in general that EB process is a mess and working together we are trying to fix it. Certainly each of us have our preference in 'how' it should be fixed. However the IV core has goals based on broadly accepted potential fixes...lets support those and keep the infighting to a minimum...

    GO IV



    more...


    pictures vs Dallas Mavericks dallas mavericks vs thunder. Watch Dallas Mavericks vs
  • Watch Dallas Mavericks vs



  • perm2gc
    12-27 12:23 AM
    Here is the link i posted

    http://www.viaindia.com/apps/forums/open.aspx?ID=742957&mid=19





    dresses Dallas Mavericks v Oklahoma dallas mavericks vs thunder. Dallas Mavericks shoots
  • Dallas Mavericks shoots



  • sbindval
    07-03 03:57 PM
    Contributed $100
    Google Order #761841760391920



    more...


    makeup Mavericks.vs.Thunder.WCF. dallas mavericks vs thunder. Oklahoma City Thunder vs
  • Oklahoma City Thunder vs



  • ns007
    04-21 08:27 AM
    Sorry, did not see this thread before.

    Please let me know if you still need someone to call members. I am available until 4pm EST today.

    Thank you for offering to volunteer for calling members in CA. Now we need 2 more volunteers to give 30-45 minutes to make the phone calls. This is a very important initiative. Kindly send me a private message if you would like to volunteer.





    girlfriend Dallas Mavericks drives on dallas mavericks vs thunder. of the Dallas Mavericks
  • of the Dallas Mavericks



  • Libra
    09-10 12:23 PM
    Andy_garcia, its good for you that your wife and kid are working. We people dont use consulting firm to get our GC, but got stuck with those companies because if we leave them we have to start whole GC process. So we dont want that to happen and wait for 10 more yrs to get our GC.

    I have been here for 8 years and I do not have the option of going back to my country like you guys from India. I applied for my 485 2 years ago and my son and wife are working already.

    When I was on H1, I was happy with the company. It seems that people who are using the sponsor company as a tool to get the GC are the ones complaininf the most about.





    hairstyles Game 1 Dallas Mavericks vs dallas mavericks vs thunder. The Dallas Mavericks (23-5)
  • The Dallas Mavericks (23-5)



  • chanduv23
    11-11 03:44 PM
    I am not sure what lobbying efforts would do for us, haven't worked so far...In my opinion we need more media visibility which makes politicians to take notice of us. In these troubled times they are open to any kind of ideas that would help the housing market.

    Just show the real numbers to the media -

    Approx 0.5 million people (well educated with decent earnings)
    Atleast 50 to 60% of these people could potentially buy houses if immigration related uncertainities are gone
    Potentially quarter of million buyers for houses, that is a lot!!

    I leave it up to IV core to followup on these ideas. I repeat, as I have done so many times, it is all about marketing + media presence. We won the July 2007 visa bulletin battle because of adverse media reaction to the state department. Grass roots stuff is all good, but no one will ever notice it.

    Please come up with ideas. Remember - IV core looks at all the posts and get ideas from the forums. You may want to start a thread saying - Lets all put our constructive thoughts about moving ahead with Obama administration here. People can posts their ideas, plans, implementations, strategies ...... and we can all discuss.

    Rajuram - your concern is valid and basically what is happening is - IV now needs some dedicated new generation members who can make a difference. thats how IV has been working from the beginnibg, people come and go - so do admins.

    You can help in this way by opening a thread to share new ideas and strategies.





    vagish
    04-04 02:40 PM
    It is true. But either Corporate America or Lawyers does not want to address the issues raised by Unions or anti immigrants. They want free ride and does not care about working class. No bold leadership in congress to address both sides issues. Congress members are siding with any one of two groups. Everyone knows that compromise will easily pass. But compromise will not give free ride to any group. Basically moderate H1b and GC increase with protection to US workers without wage pressurw will get most of the congress support. Even with illegal immigration also it is easy to pass if they give citizenship to existing people and allow more workers with complete protection to US workers without wage pressure will get most of congress support.
    the reason why Mccain and kennedy partnership failed, because kennedy wanted to put the fair wage clause into the bill so that futurue employees can
    atleast get the prevaling wages( it makes sense logically ), but republican Mccain didn't like it because they want employer to pay what ever they feel like,
    if that happens you will see that in future the quota for low wage workers will also get filled in one day as we saw with H1B's yesterday, and then even 400000 for semiskilled workers would not be enough.

    Iam not saying H1B get paid less, but there is lot of abuse going on,
    1500000 application just on aptil 2 tell you a lot of things, no matter how much demand is there, it is outrageous.

    when american people see that corporate america wants quota less h1B , they going to be on the streets just like illigals were last year.

    thanks





    WeldonSprings
    03-19 05:02 PM
    Can EB2 move to March 06?

    I hope this happens. :)



    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Blog Archive